Automotive Engineers

 
Home | Automotive body engineering | Engine & fuel engineering | Automotive tire/wheel engineer | Automotive suspension engineer | Automotive steering systems en | Automotive materials engineeri | Automotive lubricant engineeri | Automotive Engineering other t
  Position:Home>Engine & fuel engineering>Article Content
Twincharging - can the supercharger be too small?
Source:Internet Author:Unknow Pubdate:2010-06-17  
junglerc (Automotive) 9 Jun 10 23:13
Hello,

I have searched and read the previous threads on twingcharging. I understand the recommendation is to go huge on the turbos and small on the supercharger. Sounds good and fits well with what I'm planning.

Question is: Can the supercharger be made too small?   

patprimmer (Publican) 9 Jun 10 23:53
Yes


Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
 

junglerc (Automotive) 12 Jun 10 13:07
I mean, besides the obvious.

Say a very small overdriven supercharger, with a decreasing boost curve when operated by itself compared to a larger supercharger driven slower with stable boost curve. 字串8

Which would provide less parasitic losses when compounded with the turbos?

Would the larger supercharger still be the more efficient setup if cam timing is optimized for exhaust scavenging?

Total pressure ratio expected at intake manifold is 3.5 - 4:1. The turbos in mind are more than capable of providing the power and pressure ratio, but surge line comes in pretty high. Looking at the super/turbo combination to improve spool/surge line.

 

hemi (Automotive) 12 Jun 10 20:57
As you design your application, you have to determine the operating range that you're expecting from the supercharger.  Then you select a supercharger that best suits this range and your performance goals.  If your desired range exceeds what's available on the market, then you have to compromise (overspeed the supercharger, with associated loss of efficiency & risk of failure; or pull back your performance goals). 字串4

patprimmer (Publican) 12 Jun 10 22:29
If you state precisely and concisely what you actually mean, you will greatly increase your chances of an accurate answer.

Most here can't be bothered drawing a question our of you or trying to second guess what your actual meaning is if you can't be bothered drafting a decent question.

You should use within reason, the smallest supercharge and drive ratio combination that will stay within it's efficient speed range over the operating range of the engine.

You may also be advised to consider weight and packaging issues when deciding between several that are of reasonably suitable airflow. Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
 

junglerc (Automotive) 13 Jun 10 4:47
字串6

Thanks


 

(Click:
Previous:Sequential turbo surge line calculation?   Next:Discuss twin screw vs centrifugal superchargers
[Add TO Favorites] [TOP] [PRINT] [CLOCE WINDOWS]  
  Hot Article
·Electric vs. mechanical water
·Small diesel engine?
·SAE J2044 clarification
·turbine corrected mass flow
·Cleaning carbon deposits, reco
·Diesel engine torque curve
·Intake plenum size
·Smog pump output
·Honda GX160 5.5 buggy engine -
·Calculation For Intake runner
·DOH Cam Head Design
·Exhaust scavenging on a turbo
  Related Articles
·Discuss twin screw vs centrifu
·VGT turbos
·Intake/Exhaust Design Literatu
·Ecowatts
·Turbocharger inlet
·4000 bhp natural gas dyno
·Cooler (radiator) core data sc
·PGMFI Clear Flood operation?
·Exhaust gas mass flow rate
·Please kindly explain oxygen s
·Benefit of longer stroke
·Gas Mileage Gears
MBT SHOES CLEARANCE SALE Cheap LouisVuitton Bags Civil / Environmental Engineers Structural Engineers Aeronautic Engineers Automotive Engineers Chemical Engineers Geotechnical Engineers Industrial / Manufacturing Engineers Materials Engineers Computer Engineers Agricultural Engineers Mechanical Engineers Petroleum Engineers Bioengineers Military Engineers